By Darwin Stephenson
The sustainability conversation in the connected device industry has been fundamentally misdirected. For years, we've operated under the assumption that achieving environmental goals requires convincing consumers to change their behavior—to buy less, upgrade less frequently, or accept compromises in their technology experience. At Eco Toreda, we believe this approach is not only unrealistic but also misses the real opportunity to create meaningful environmental impact.
The truth is more straightforward than most industry leaders want to acknowledge: consumer behavior drives market reality, not the other way around. The reverse supply chain for connected devices and the secondary markets that distribute them exist as direct reflections of consumer demand. When we see inefficiencies, waste, or unmet needs in these systems, we're witnessing symptoms of demand that isn't being properly understood or served.
This fundamental insight has led us to a different conclusion about how to achieve sustainability goals. Rather than trying to change consumer behavior or force existing markets to operate differently, we need to listen more carefully to what consumers are actually telling us about their unmet needs. The solution isn't to fix the current model—it's to recognize that the current model is working exactly as designed for the consumers it serves, while completely failing to address a massive untapped market.
Understanding the True Nature of Consumer Demand
To understand why traditional approaches to device sustainability have fallen short, we need to examine the mechanics of how consumer demand actually shapes markets. The current ecosystem serves two primary consumer segments quite effectively: those who purchase new devices and want the latest technology, and those who purchase refurbished devices primarily based on price considerations.
These two segments create what economists recognize as a mature market dynamic. New device purchasers drive innovation and premium pricing, while refurbished device purchasers create a secondary market that extends device lifecycles to some degree. The competition between these segments naturally drives toward efficiency improvements, cost reductions, and technological advancement—all positive developments, but ones that come with inherent limitations.
The challenge with this two-segment model becomes clear when we examine its competitive dynamics. Manufacturers competing for new device sales must constantly innovate and differentiate their products, which creates pressure for shorter replacement cycles and planned obsolescence. Meanwhile, companies competing in the refurbished market face a race to the bottom on pricing, which limits their ability to invest in restoration quality, customer service, or market expansion.
This competitive structure explains why sustainability initiatives within the current model often feel forced or artificial. They're trying to overlay environmental considerations onto a market system that wasn't designed to optimize for environmental outcomes. The result is incremental improvements that don't address the fundamental resource utilization challenge we face as an industry.
Recognizing the Unserved Market Opportunity
The breakthrough insight that has shaped Eco Toreda's approach came from recognizing that the current two-segment model serves only a fraction of the global population that desires access to connected technology. While industry discussions often focus on the roughly 25% of the world's population that currently has meaningful access to these devices, we became fascinated by the 30%—approximately 2.4 billion people who want this technology but cannot access it through traditional ownership models.
This isn't simply a matter of affordability in the conventional sense. Many of these potential consumers have sufficient income to pay for device access, but they cannot navigate the barriers that traditional ownership models create. These barriers might include lack of access to credit, uncertainty about device longevity and repair options, concerns about obsolescence risk, or simply the inability to justify the capital expense of device ownership when their primary need is for device functionality.
When we examine this unserved market more carefully, a fascinating pattern emerges. None of us necessarily want to own devices—we simply want reliable access to device functionality. We want to stay connected, access information, participate in digital commerce, and benefit from technological innovation, but we don't all need the status or investment characteristics that come with ownership.
This distinction between wanting device functionality and wanting device ownership represents the key insight that unlocks sustainable solutions. By focusing on providing access rather than ownership, we can serve this unserved market while simultaneously creating the conditions for much more efficient resource utilization.
The Mathematics of Extended Device Lifecycles
Traditional device ownership patterns in developed markets typically result in two to three years of active use per device, even when the device remains functional for much longer periods. This usage pattern is driven by upgrade cycles, changing needs, and the economic logic of ownership in markets where new devices are readily accessible.
The mathematical opportunity becomes clear when we consider what happens if we can extend total device utilization from this two-to-three-year pattern to four or five years of active use across multiple users. We're not talking about modest improvements—we're talking about nearly doubling the total utility extracted from each manufactured device.
This extended utilization becomes possible when we remove the ownership barrier that currently limits device access. Through subscription models, a device can serve its first user for eighteen to twenty-four months, then transition seamlessly to serve a second user for another eighteen to twenty-four months, and potentially continue to a third user depending on the device condition and technology evolution.
The environmental mathematics of this extended lifecycle approach are compelling. Each device that serves three users across four to five years prevents the need to manufacture two additional devices to serve the same total user demand. When we multiply this effect across millions of devices and users, we're looking at potential reductions in manufacturing demand that could meaningfully impact resource extraction, energy consumption, and waste generation.
But the mathematics work only if we can successfully serve the unserved market. If subscription models simply cannibalize existing ownership patterns without expanding total access, we haven't created additional utility—we've just redistributed existing utility in a potentially less efficient way.
Building Sustainable Access Infrastructure
Creating effective device subscription models for the unserved market requires understanding the specific barriers that prevent these consumers from accessing traditional ownership models. Price sensitivity is certainly one factor, but it's often not the primary limitation. More significant barriers include uncertainty about total cost of ownership, lack of support infrastructure, concerns about device reliability, and inability to navigate complex service ecosystems.
Subscription models can address these barriers more effectively than traditional ownership models because they shift responsibility for device performance, support, and lifecycle management from individual consumers to service providers with specialized capabilities. When consumers subscribe to device access rather than purchasing devices, they're essentially outsourcing the complexities of device ownership to organizations that can manage those complexities more efficiently.
This outsourcing creates opportunities for service providers to optimize device lifecycles in ways that individual consumers cannot. Professional restoration capabilities, inventory management systems, customer support infrastructure, and lifecycle planning all become economically viable when spread across large subscriber bases. These capabilities enable service providers to maintain device performance and customer satisfaction while extending device lifecycles far beyond what individual ownership typically achieves.
The infrastructure requirements for successful device subscription models are significant, but they're also scalable in ways that traditional retail models are not. Once established, subscription infrastructure can serve growing customer bases with relatively modest incremental investments, creating the economic conditions necessary to reach price points that make sense for the unserved market.
Creating Market Conditions for Sustainability
The beauty of focusing on the unserved market is that it creates market conditions where sustainability becomes economically advantageous rather than economically costly. When service providers compete to serve consumers who want device access but cannot afford traditional ownership, they naturally optimize for extended device lifecycles, efficient restoration processes, and reliable performance across multiple users.
This is fundamentally different from trying to convince existing markets to operate more sustainably. Instead of asking consumers or companies to accept higher costs or reduced performance in service of environmental goals, we're creating a market where environmental optimization aligns with business optimization.
The competitive dynamics in this unserved market favor companies that can extract maximum utility from each manufactured device. Companies that can restore devices more effectively, manage inventory more efficiently, and maintain customer satisfaction across longer device lifecycles will outcompete those that cannot. This creates natural market pressure toward the kinds of practices that environmental advocates have been trying to encourage through regulation or consumer education.
As this market develops and matures, it will also create feedback effects that influence manufacturing decisions. When manufacturers know that their devices will serve multiple users across extended lifecycles through subscription models, they have stronger incentives to design for durability, repairability, and longevity. The subscription market becomes a customer for manufacturing approaches that optimize total lifecycle value rather than initial sale price.
The Network Effects of Expanded Access
One of the most powerful aspects of successfully serving the unserved market is the network effects that emerge when more people have access to connected technology. Each new subscriber to device access services increases the value of the network for all participants, creating positive feedback loops that benefit both served and previously unserved populations.
These network effects operate at multiple levels. At the most basic level, communication networks become more valuable as more people gain access to them. But the effects extend beyond communication to include digital commerce, information access, educational opportunities, and participation in the broader digital economy.
When we successfully bring device subscriptions to the 30% of the world's population that currently lacks adequate access to connected technology, we're not just achieving environmental benefits through extended device lifecycles. We're also creating economic value that didn't previously exist, enabling new forms of productivity and innovation, and building more inclusive technological ecosystems.
This expanded access also creates more diverse and resilient markets for device functionality. Rather than concentrating demand among consumers who can afford ownership, subscription models distribute demand across much broader populations with different needs, preferences, and usage patterns. This diversity makes the overall ecosystem more stable and less vulnerable to economic disruptions that might affect particular consumer segments.
Looking Forward: Sustainable Growth Through Inclusion
The path forward for device sustainability lies not in convincing current consumers to consume differently, but in expanding access to the billions of potential consumers who are currently excluded from the connected device ecosystem. By focusing on device subscriptions that serve this unserved market, we can achieve environmental goals while simultaneously addressing digital inclusion and creating new economic opportunities.
This approach requires us to think differently about what success looks like in the connected device industry. Instead of measuring success primarily through unit sales or revenue per customer, we need to focus on metrics like total device utilization, lifecycle efficiency, and the breadth of access we're providing across different populations.
At Eco Toreda, we believe this shift in focus represents the future of sustainable technology. Rather than treating environmental responsibility as a constraint on business growth, we're proving that environmental optimization can be the foundation for serving previously unserved markets and creating new forms of economic value.
The opportunity is enormous. If we can successfully bring device subscriptions to even a portion of the 2.4 billion people who currently lack adequate access to connected technology, while extending average device lifecycles from two to three years to four to five years, we will have created one of the most significant sustainability improvements in the history of the technology industry.
This is how real sustainability happens—not through asking people to accept less, but through creating systems that deliver more value from the resources we extract from our planet. By serving the unserved market through device subscriptions, we're proving that inclusion and sustainability are not just compatible—they're mutually reinforcing forces that can drive the next phase of growth in the connected device industry.
‍
‍